What vendor independence means
Intelligence724 begins with the client’s process, economics, risk, architecture, and operating requirements. A platform, model, partner, or implementation path is evaluated only after those requirements and decision gates are documented.
Commercial disclosure
- Disclose relevant referral fees, resale margins, marketplace incentives, cloud credits, co-selling commitments, investments, and alliance benefits.
- Do not accept undisclosed commissions tied to a client recommendation.
- Identify specialist subcontractors, their role, and whether Intelligence724 marks up or manages their work.
- Record conflicts, recusals, and client-approved exceptions before evaluation begins.
Client-owned decision system
- The client approves requirements, weights, acceptance thresholds, risk tolerance, and final decision rights.
- Evaluation sets, scorecards, test results, architecture records, and decision memoranda remain usable if another provider implements the work.
- Comparisons include build, buy, configure, conventional automation, defer, and do-nothing options where relevant.
- Total cost includes integration, human review, monitoring, change, migration, and exit—not only license or model consumption.
Portability and exit
Architecture recommendations address data export, prompt and workflow portability, evaluation-asset ownership, telemetry access, model change, deprecation, transition assistance, and a credible return to a safe prior process.
Claim boundary
This charter is an operating policy. It does not imply that every technology provider or implementation partner is conflicted, and it does not convert Intelligence724 into a law firm, regulated auditor, or accredited certification body.
