Skip to content
Process-first consulting heritage informed by Info724 work since 1998. Modern machine intelligence, independent by design. Visit Info724
INTELLIGENCE724PROCESS-FIRST MACHINE INTELLIGENCE

How we work

How We Work: Process-First Intelligence Method

Define. Measure. Analyze. Improve. Control. Govern throughout.

Define. Measure. Analyze. Improve. Control.

The method preserves the discipline of DMAIC while extending it for predictive, generative, retrieval, and agentic systems. Governance is not a final compliance step; it runs through every phase.

01

Define

Bound the outcome, process, owners, affected parties, and unacceptable harms.

02

Measure

Establish current performance, cost, variation, data quality, and control burden.

03

Analyze

Verify root causes and compare non-AI and AI options, architecture, economics, and risk.

04

Improve

Pilot the smallest controlled intervention with evaluation, limited release, and rollback.

05

Control

Monitor value, incidents, change, renewal conditions, and safe retirement.

What the method refuses to skip

01

Outcome before algorithm

Define the operating result and critical-to-quality measures before discussing models.

02

Baseline before benefit

No improvement claim is accepted without a current-state comparator and measurement method.

03

Least intelligence necessary

Prefer the simplest intervention that meets the requirement and control threshold.

04

System, not model

Evaluate people, workflow, data, interfaces, retrieval, prompts, tools, infrastructure, and controls.

05

Human oversight must be real

Reviewers need time, competence, evidence, authority, and a practical override path.

06

No-AI is a success state

The method may prove that process redesign, rules, search, data repair, or no action is preferable.

Every stage ends with an explicit choice.

A gate is not a ceremony. It records the evidence, owner, risk, conditions, next action, and events that would cause the work to pause or stop.

Define → Measure

Problem and harm gate

Is there a bounded, measurable opportunity with an accountable owner?

Measure · Rescope · Hold · Stop

Measure → Analyze

Evidence and baseline gate

Is the current state reproducible and sufficiently understood?

Analyze · Instrument first · Stop

Analyze → Improve

Option and risk gate

Which intervention best addresses the verified causes?

Pilot · Simplify · Defer · No-go

Improve → Production

Production decision gate

Did the pilot meet value, quality, control, and operating thresholds?

Scale · Revise once · Revert · Stop

Control → Renewal

Operational renewal gate

Does the capability still create value within risk tolerance?

Renew · Restrict · Remediate · Replace · Retire

More consequence requires more independent evidence and stronger control.

Assisted and material systems

Controlled support

  • Representative task evaluation
  • Privacy and security review
  • Human review and escalation
  • Monitored pilot and defined fallback
Consequential or agentic systems

Restricted authority

  • Strong presumption against broad autonomy
  • Least privilege and transaction limits
  • Independent evaluation and adversarial testing
  • Kill switch and rehearsed rollback

Answers

Frequently asked questions

Is the method a software-development waterfall?

No. Teams return to earlier stages when evidence disproves an assumption, a pilot fails, or production conditions change.

Where does governance occur?

Across every stage. Ownership, evidence, access, privacy, security, approval, monitoring, and rollback are designed from the beginning.

What happens when AI is not justified?

The engagement documents the better alternative—such as process redesign, rules, search, conventional automation, data remediation, deferment, or no action.